Posted on November
29, 2023
Cranial Tumbleweeds
Mail-in voting, Satanists, neocons,
etc.
by
Daniel
Clark
* One of the most meaningless phrases in the English language
is "with all due respect," since the speaker seldom indicates how much respect
is due. If the person or entity being
spoken of is not due any respect, then it's just a setup line, to be followed
by a statement of disrespect. The
meaning is no different than if the introductory clause were excluded
altogether. If one means to transmit the
message that Michael Moore is a lardhead, for example, one should simply say,
"Michael Moore is a lardhead," not, "With all due respect to Michael Moore, he
is a lardhead."
* Conservatives have been largely missing the point
about mail-in balloting. Yes, it creates
more vulnerabilities to voter fraud, but by far the greater threat is that of
coercion. In short, we no longer have a
secret ballot. Anymore, a union, church
group, student group or other collective can assemble and fill out its members'
ballots together, to make sure everybody is voting the "right way."
* Also, Democrats no longer need to prod people from
old folks' homes, homeless shelters and asylums to actually go to the polls in
person, and then hope they vote the way that they're told. Now, they can go to the facilities in which
those people live, and physically assist them in casting their ballots.
* Turning an election into a high school group project
is a quintessential Democrat policy, in that it perceives people only as
members of groups, and not as individuals.
The last thing they want is tens of millions of individuals voting
independently, as if they had free will, or something.
* Naturally, mail-in voting increased turnout in
demographic groups across the board, but the difference has been especially
great among college students. Is it any
wonder things are headed in the direction they are? Just look at what has been going on at
college campuses since the start of the Israel-Hamas War, and that is what's
happening to the electorate.
* Universities flatter themselves as being bulwarks
against "hate," but they only understand that term to mean bigotry against a
politically protected group. When hatred
is directed at an approved target, such as Southerners, suburbanites or
Christians, they treat it as a virtue.
In fact, it's the one thing they're most successful at teaching, even
though nobody asked them to.
* That's why incompetence is no excuse for our
educational system. Schools are actually
very successful at teaching the things they want to teach. They want to teach that it's possible to
change your gender, and the children think they can change their genders. They want to teach that carbon dioxide is
destroying the earth, and the children live in fear of carbon dioxide. If they ever want to teach mathematics and
grammar, nobody is stopping them.
* Better yet, they could start with science, by
teaching the children that the element carbon and the compound carbon dioxide
are two different substances.
* No person would consciously purchase unhappiness for
tens of thousands of dollars, but countless students are unwittingly doing
exactly that. They spend four years
being conditioned to hate their parents, their country and God, and they come
out carrying decades' worth of debt.
That's no way to live.
* Before conservatives all go stampeding to the polls
to return Donald Trump to the White House, we need to recognize that if he
wins, he will not be able to run again after that. Assuming that he understands this, we must
conclude that he will also understand that he no longer needs pro-lifers, gun
owners, and conservatives in general.
* This comes with the caveat that Trump only
understands what he wants to. If he
orders some flunky lawyer to advise him of a secret rule allowing him to serve
a third term, then he will choose not to understand the plain language of the
Twenty-Second Amendment, just as he has the Twelfth.
* Jacob Chansley, a.k.a.,
the QAnon Shaman of Capitol Riot fame, a.k.a., the
big dork who was dressed as one of the Sacred Cows from that episode of Get
Smart, has filed papers to run for Congress as a member of the Libertarian
Party. Just a friendly reminder of who
the real RINOs are.
* New Speaker of the
House Mike Johnson is releasing all the footage from the Capital Riot to the
public, which is a good thing, but it should not have been necessary. That's because Kevin McCarthy had previously
given the video to Tucker Carlson, who was expected by many to prove that the Trumpies were framed by the Deep State, and that the entire
event was an FBI false flag operation.
Did the resulting anticlimactic thud suggest that Tucker is part of the
conspiracy? Why not?
* Here are five words the
author of this site never thought he would print: Three cheers for Piers
Morgan! The toffee-nosed,
royalty-obsessed, left-of-center English broadcaster interviewed social media
phenomenon, former kickboxing champion and self-appointed manliness expert
Andrew Tate, and actually held the big boob accountable for his refusal to
admit that Hamas is a terrorist organization.
At every evasion, Morgan put the question to him again, and asked him
why he refused to give a straight answer.
Hopefully, alleged conservatives and genuine Tate sycophants Tucker
Carlson and Candace Owens have watched it, and been duly ashamed.
* The word "sycophants"
is not derived from sucking pants, but anyone who has seen the Carlson and
Owens interviews with Tate could be excused for thinking it was.
* Upon receiving reports of the Hamas atrocities
against the Israelis, Leftists demanded to see evidence to support the claim that
babies had been beheaded. Forensic
pathologists have verified that many beheaded babies were found after the raid,
but that's beside the point. No honest
person would have seriously doubted the claim in the first place. Those who were expressing this doubt were
merely acting as defense attorneys for a bunch of genocidal terrorists.
* Ever wonder why there's never any demand to show
proof of baby killing in our country?
There's a simple reason for that, which is that everyone already knows
it's going on. If you show a picture of
a baby that was killed in an abortion to somebody who is trying to appear
neutral on the issue, that person will get mad at you for showing him the
picture. He will not get mad at the
killers, because he already condones what they're doing.
* If it were true, as the Supreme Court claimed in Roe
v. Wade, that it is not objectively known when a new human life begins,
then shouldn't our legislators drop everything until they get to the bottom of
that question? If our laws allow the
annual killing of a million creatures that may or may not be people, what
exactly is the argument in favor of allowing that to continue?
* In his 1983 essay Abortion and the Conscience of
a Nation, President Reagan wrote, "The real question today is not when
human life begins, but, What is the value of human life?" Forty years later, too many pro-lifers are
still exhausting a lot of energy addressing that first question, while the
other side is already answering the second.
* As Billy Crystal's character says in Throw Momma
From the Train, "A writer writes, always."
Ronald Reagan was always writing.
There is little evidence that the same is true of that esteemed
presidential man of letters, Barack Obama.
* Well, there is that one letter he wrote that has
been recently discovered, but do we really want to get into that?
* Obama's mother's first name was Stanley. If he were a Republican, everybody would know
that.
* Reactions to the on-ice killing of hockey player
Adam Johnson are a microcosm of how evil is abetted by people's refusal to
recognize it. Video of the incident
clearly shows that Matt Petgrave deliberately lifted his leg above shoulder
level to kick Johnson with his skate blade, yet initial reports declared it to
be a "freak accident," and everybody seems to agree that he cannot have
possibly done it on purpose. Those
reactions reflect an unwillingness to consider that one's own moral standards
might not be universally held. You would
never kick a man in the neck with a skate blade, so for somebody else to have
done so must have been accidental.
* It is this same phenomenon that leads people to
accept the excuse that Hamas must be motivated by legitimate grievances. Most people can't imagine themselves storming
into people's homes and slaughtering whole families, raping teenage girls and
beheading babies, so there must be some context in which to rationalize
it. Either those things didn't really
happen, or they were compelled by extraordinary circumstances, or else they
were no worse than something the Israelis supposedly did. The obvious conclusion that one side in the
conflict is evil, and its people voluntarily commit evil acts, has been
preemptively excluded from the discussion.
* When Petgrave's name was announced at his team's
next home game, the crowd gave him a standing ovation. This was not because the people in attendance
thought Johnson's killing was a good thing.
Rather, they behaved as if it were a tragic event that victimized both
men equally.
* Now that Petgrave has been charged with
manslaughter, we can expect there to be attempts to smear the deceased Johnson
in order to maintain a moral equivalence.
If Johnson ever injured an opponent while committing an interference
penalty, that will be introduced in the court of public opinion as evidence
that he was no better than the man who killed him.
* When people openly declare their evil intentions,
it's best to believe them. When open
borders advocates chant, "No borders, no wall, no USA at all," they really mean
that. Ditto that for rainbow activists
who say, "We're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children." Several years ago, when pro-abortion
demonstrators shouted down their opponents by yelling, "Hail Satan! Hail Satan!" it was generally dismissed as
sarcasm, as if they were parodying the way pro-lifers portray them. Today, New Mexico Governor Lujan Grisham
hosts an abortion hotline at taxpayer expense, which directs women to a clinic
that is operated by the Satanic Temple.
Still laughing?
* It requires willful ignorance to refer to people
chanting "No justice, no peace" as peaceful demonstrators.
* The Satanic Temple is a prime example of evil
exploiting people's refusal to accept it.
To hear its members tell it, they don't actually believe in the
so-called, quote-unquote "devil."
They're just "freethinkers."
According to the "about" page on its website, "The mission of the
Satanic Temple is to encourage benevolence and empathy, reject tyrannical
authority, advocate practical common sense, oppose injustice, and undertake
noble pursuits." Gosh, what a blunder it
was to have accidentally named themselves "Satanic," then.
* Before much longer, Satanists will have become a
legitimized political constituency.
Democrat pollsters will go on TV and discuss the importance of turning
out the Satanist vote, and presidential candidates will speak at their events
and pander for their endorsement. They
already do these things with regard to Planned Parenthood. Is the Satanic Temple really much more of a
stretch?
* In the 1984 Dragnet movie starring Dan
Aykroyd and Tom Hanks, the villains belonged to an organization called PAGAN,
which stood for People Against Goodness and Normalcy. At the time, this was meant to be amusing,
not prescient.
* Nikki Haley has not softened her position against
abortion, but she has made the softening of her rhetoric about it a focus of
her presidential campaign. Supposedly,
this has helped her in the polls, but it has also made it impossible for her to
adequately explain herself. While
scolding her fellow Republicans for their stridency, she has repeatedly said,
"We need to respect the issue."
Huh? The issue is something that
Haley herself recognizes as the killing of innocent people. What about that do we need to respect? She should not be allowed to get through
another debate without answering that question.
* Why must Haley's rise in the polls be attributed to
her moderate mushspeak on abortion, instead of what
really distinguishes her from the field, which is that she is a traditional
foreign policy conservative? The untold
story here is that the Republican Party has been infected by a noxious strain
of libertarian blame-America-first peacenikkery, but
that its takeover is not a done deal.
* Haley was a great representative for us at the UN
because she advocated for America in a firm and dignified manner. In her presidential campaign, she has chosen
instead to play the liberal "strong woman" stereotype, meaning that she has
become shrill and irrational. Her
rejoinder to any rebuttal seems to be that the other person better back off or
she is going to get very mad at him. Her
campaign slogan might as well be "Don't Go There!"
* It is impossible to imagine Jeane
Kirkpatrick or Condoleezza Rice carrying on the way Haley has during the
debates. Perhaps that's why neither of
them ever ran.
* During the Republican debate in Miami, Haley even
called Vivek Ramaswamy "scum," which is obviously way out of bounds. A smarmy, unprincipled eel he may be, but
scum?
* You never hear conservatives refer to a "strong
woman," because we don't think there's anything exceptional about it. The liberal "strong woman" designation is a
backhanded insult to all the women they don't place in that category, which is
most of them.
* How many times does Megan Rapinoe have to go away
before she goes away?
* Sports Illustrated has been caught publishing
AI-generated articles, and attributing them to nonexistent authors with fake
profiles. This should come as no
surprise, because sports journalism has been on autopilot for decades. If you want to be a sportswriter, call the
fans racists. Demand that women who play
in a league that generates no revenue be paid the same as men who produce
billions of dollars a year. Lie about
Title IX every chance you get. Champion
pointlessly bitter and hateful people like Colin Kaepernick and Megan Rapinoe,
while shielding them from the need to ever explain themselves. Make lame excuses for the most egregious acts
of unsportsmanlike conduct. Portray
America as an oppressor in any feature you write about any athlete. The sports media have become such a cliche
factory that their work requires no human thought process whatsoever. There's no need to pay people to write the
articles, when they can simply be poured out of a can.
* The GOPeaceniks have
become deeply invested in the leftist canard that the military-industrial
complex is lobbying America into wars in order to enrich itself through
increased weapons production. Would it
not also serve these sinister forces for us to be adequately militarily
equipped during peacetime? Then how come
we never are?
* Donald Trump has claimed countless times to have
"rebuilt the military." Does this mean
that he, the grand poobah of the GOPeaceniks,
is really a tool of the military-industrial complex?
* Of course he did no such thing. A rebuilt American military would not have to
worry about running low on resources just because we're aiding Ukraine. If this rebuilding took place, then where's
the stuff?
* President Eisenhower coined the term
"military-industrial complex" in his farewell address. The way that phrase is usually employed today
is the result of a wild extrapolation.
Ike's brief and cryptic warning does not remotely resemble the grandiose
conspiracy theory that is commonly attributed to him.
* Ike noted that prior to the Second World War,
factories were repurposed for military production whenever the need arose, but
that this left us undersupplied in the meantime. Even as he expressed concern about the development
of full-time military contractors, he acknowledged their necessity. He did not consider them to be the
enemy. Those who do are agreeing with
Michael Moore the Lardhead, not Eisenhower.
* In today's political climate, any Republican who
supports any American military action, or even our provision of military aid to
another country, is bound to be labeled a "neocon," but this is not a dirty
word. The real neocons were so named
because they were former socialists from the beatnik era who had become newly
conservative. They were also mostly
Jewish, a detail that is not lost on many of those who use the term as if it
were an expletive.
* Critics of the neocons are generally correct on the
point that they are overly-interventionist.
Neocons favored American involvement in the Balkans, for instance, based
on their belief that we had a duty to stop the atrocities that were taking
place, even though there was no American national interest. They are certainly not aggressors, however,
which makes it pretty funny to hear them called "warmongers" by apologists for
Vladimir Putin.
* "Neocons" is an epithet that used to be hurled by
liberals against conservatives of all stripes, without concern for what the
word actually meant. They were only
slandering their opponents through word association. "Neo."
Get it? Yes, it was that
childish.
* Vivek Ramaswamy has created an infantile pledge he
says that he, as president, would require his appointees to sign, which he
calls the "No to Neocons Pledge."' One of
the statements in it is that "war is never a preference, only a necessity." Of course, nobody ever makes the case for a
war by saying it isn't necessary, but he prefers it. Nor does anyone concede the necessity of a
war he opposes, no matter how compelling the case may be. If America is attacked, as it was on 9/11, is
it necessary to fight back, or is it just that we prefer not to be
conquered? Ramaswamy thinks we should
not have responded militarily to 9/11, so his characterization of war as a
necessity does not seem to reflect his true opinion.
* As long as everybody in politics is going pledge crazy,
all presidential candidates should be asked to sign a pledge assuring us that
they don't believe 9/11 was an inside job.
If they don't think we should have responded militarily against the
Taliban, that doesn't leave a lot of other possibilities. We need to know which of these candidates
would be steadfast in protecting our country against foreign terrorists, and
which ones would leave us vulnerable, because they're too busy pointing the
finger of blame internally, at American neocon bogeymen.
* With all due respect to Vivek Ramaswamy, he is a
smarmy, unprincipled eel.
The Shinbone: The Frontier of the Free Press
Mailbag . Issue Index . Politimals . College Football Czar